In a recent development, the Supreme Court of India has declined a plea for the regulation of cryptocurrencies, emphasizing the limitations of its authority to direct legislation.
The petition, filed as a public interest litigation, sought guidelines for the trading and mining of cryptocurrencies. However, the court determined that the true intention behind the plea was to seek bail in pending proceedings.
This decision adds to the ongoing discussions surrounding the regulation of cryptocurrencies in India, as the country grapples with the need for comprehensive legislative actions.
Key Takeaways
- India’s Supreme Court refused to entertain a petition seeking direction to the government to frame legislation for crypto.
- The court stated that the real purpose of the petition is to seek bail in pending proceedings against the petitioner.
- Courts in India have no authority to direct the legislature to frame a law.
- The relief sought by the petitioner is considered more appropriate for a legislative direction.
Court’s Refusal to Entertain Petition
In a blow to the petitioner’s efforts, the Supreme Court dismissed the plea for crypto regulation, refusing to entertain the petition seeking direction to the government to frame legislation.
The court stated that the real purpose of the petition is to seek bail in pending proceedings against the petitioner. Manu Prashant Wig, the director of Blue Fox Motion Picture Limited, filed the public interest litigation against the Union of India and others. Wig is currently in judicial custody and accused of inducing people to invest money in a scheme.
The court clarified that it does not have the authority to direct the legislature to frame a law. It gave the petitioner the liberty to move the appropriate court for the grant of regular bail.
This decision adds to the ongoing discussions on crypto regulation in India.
Background on the Petitioner and the Case
Manu Prashant Wig, the director of Blue Fox Motion Picture Limited, is the petitioner in the public interest litigation (PIL) filed against the Union of India and others in the Supreme Court.
Here is some background information on the petitioner and the case:
- Wig is associated with Tokenz Limited, a centralized cryptocurrency exchange operated by Blue Fox Motion Picture Limited.
- He is currently in judicial custody and has been accused of inducing people to invest money in a fraudulent scheme.
- The case was filed by the Economic Offence Wing of Delhi Police, with over 130 victims alleging fraud.
- Wig’s wife also filed for and obtained anticipatory bail as the investigation team wanted to question her.
- The petitioner’s request for bail seems to be more in the nature of seeking a legislative direction.
This information provides context to understand the motivations and circumstances surrounding the petitioner and the case.
India’s Position on Crypto and Legislative Actions
India’s stance on cryptocurrencies and its legislative actions have been the subject of ongoing discussions and scrutiny. In 2020, the Supreme Court overturned a ban on banks supporting or engaging in crypto transactions.
However, in 2022, India introduced stiff taxes and payment processors cut off local crypto exchanges, leading to enforcement actions against at least 10 crypto exchanges.
India has also pushed the G20 to accept global guidelines for crypto, despite not having its own legislation in place. The government has kept a crypto bill in cold storage since 2021 but has indicated that a decision will be made soon.
The recent increase in action against crypto scams in India has further highlighted the need for clear regulations in the country. The Supreme Court’s refusal to entertain the petition for crypto regulation adds to the ongoing discussions and scrutiny surrounding India’s position on cryptocurrencies.
Conclusion
The Supreme Court of India has rejected a petition seeking government direction to regulate cryptocurrencies, stating that it does not have the authority to create laws.
The petitioner was given the option to seek regular bail through the appropriate court.
This decision highlights the ongoing discussions and challenges surrounding cryptocurrency regulation in India, where the government has lifted a ban on crypto transactions but has yet to enact comprehensive legislation.
Yesterday News:
